AZHOC - Arizona Homeowners Coalition
Voice for homeowner rights and justice. Logged in as

Comments or Questions

 To post a comment or ask a question please either register here Click here or log in above.

Thank You

Please log in to submit content!


We live in condominium complex in Phoenix. Our CC&R’s states a lease has to be for a period of at least 12 months. Now we are faced with homeowners using VRBO and a minimum of...
Read More
1 2 3 8
  • From dennisl on Kicked out of Board Meeting


    You are absolutely right, while we have laws that are meant to protect the rights of individuals, boards that want to do what they want to do irrespective of the law can with for the most part impunity. Mostly because they bank on the fact that homeowners will not risk their hard earned money trying to get the board to follow the law. By the way the board get to use your (community) money to pay for attorneys to defend their actions if you try and take them to court. Until we can get real accountability and consequences for violating the law this will never change. The ADRE and ALJ process is not perfect but it is far better than going to superior court to enforce the law. The one advantage of the ALJ process is that if you prevail the judge will order the association to comply with the law in the future. If they refuse to comply with that order you can file contempt of court charges against them that could lead to significant fines and even jail time for the individual board members.

    Please don’t get me wrong I’ve no interest in having everyone go out and bring charges against their boards but the issue is the open meeting law is there for a reason. When no one is watching an association is when bad things happen and money is lost and stolen and your communities go to ruin. Clear violations of the law cannot be ignored because if it is it will simply keep getting worse and worse for your community. There is absolutely no reason to not have complete transparency of the business of the community. The board has the absolute power to what they believe is right as long as it is done in the open. There are many communities that conduct their business with complete transparency so any complaint that it is too hard is totally baseless.

    In Joe’s case the board claimed that it was conducting an executive session. Which is fine as long as they were only discussing issues allowed for exceptions to open meeting authorized in the law. As a reminder we did get changes to the law that required the board to identify the specific exception they were using to conduct the executive session in the notice for that meeting. Discussion of any community business that does not meet those exceptions in executive session violates the law.


    Go to comment
    2020/01/14 at 7:00 pm
  • From dennisl on Removal of Community Sign Boards

    Richard a little follow up.

    HOA management companies and attorneys will tell the board whatever they believe that the board wants to hear. The reality is that gang mailboxes are for the most part common property of the association and not the property of the post office. As such the association can establish rules for posting on that property but the post office has nothing to do with it. The same goes with walls, if the walls that you are talking about are private property either owned by the community as common property or by individual homeowners the city will not get involved in the regulation of those structures nor will the police. Unless the wall are public property the city has no authority to regulate them. These scare tactics are used to pass the buck and attempt to legitimize the boards attempts to censor the homeowners and deny them their fundamental freedom of speech. While HOA and Condo’s are corporations and not governments and the Constitution was written to protect the people from abuses of their governments the rights of individual citizens are still public policy and no contract even the contract that establishes the property servitudes your CC&R’s may not unreasonably burden your fundamental constitutional rights as a violation of public policy not under constitutional law but rather under property law. Any provision in the CC&R that would unreasonably burden your constitutional rights as public policy is void and unenforceable. Restatement of Law third Property Servitude 2000 American Law Institute section 3.1.


    Go to comment
    2020/01/10 at 5:10 pm
  • From Tom Smalley on Property Management Transition

    My sincere apologies for the delay in responding. Thank you for your broad and detailed overview. This information will greatly assist me in the initial conversations with our board. I greatly appreciate you offering to come for a visit. I will reach back if the board feels this is something they would like to do.
    Again – Thank you!

    Go to comment
    2020/01/04 at 4:19 pm
  • From dennisl on Property Management Transition

    This is one of the most important and difficult task that any HOA can undertake.

    First and foremost is the transition of the associations money. You must locate all association financial accounts and transition signature authority and access for those accounts. You then need to secure all bank statement records from the past management company or financial institutions and particularly for the last couple of months and scrutinize all the financial transactions in that time period to determine if they were all appropriate. Along with the financial access and records comes the assessment payment status and history records of all homeowners. You should ask for a current financial status from the management company including accounts receivable as well as accounts payable. If your association has a long term maintenance plan or reserve study you need to get a copy of that plan.

    Then you must obtain all association records starting with the original and all changes to the governing documents for the association (CC&R’s, Articles of Incorporation , bylaws, and rules and policies) then all other records of the association such as meeting minutes, board resolutions, violation notices. Also include any committee records such as architectural review committee records of approved or rejected change request and minutes.

    You must obtain copies of all current association contracts with any vendor.

    You must obtain any records of legal action taken by the association and against the association.

    You must obtain the address of record and contact information for all current home owners.

    From what it sounds the community manager probably has all of this in several boxes of paper, use this list to find and organize the essential records and separate them from the chaff. Any new management company should scan these paper records and organize them for easy access and retrievability.

    As for the board duties and responsibilities for that I’ll need to go to Tucson and meet with your remaining board and members of your community to get to understand your specific community and encourage members to participate an take interest in their community. Contact me with the site email and we can coordinate such a meeting if you desire.


    Go to comment
    2020/01/03 at 8:00 am
  • From Jane Toler on AZHOC Inbox: Fed Up With Property Manager

    I have been in this particular community since 2004. It was well run and the neighbor was the HOA president at that time. Unfortunately, a new president of our HOA was elected in 2008 and things have gone down hill from that time. The common pool areas are not being maintained, the owner of our management company lives in our community and just this month is taking over the treasurer’s position on our board of directors. I feel the current president and manager are stealing money from the reserve funds and that is all they are concerned with.

    The president assured one of the homeowners that the board was taking into consideration her concerns of the pools as she and I had taken pictures of paint peeling, the pergola boards rotting, caulking missing around tiles in the poolside bathrooms, the decking buckling from the water being too high in the pools, chairs that needed plastic lacing replaced so people would not fall through and the caulking in the pool to prevent water from going under the decking was deteriorating. But both of us are concerned that the people or person who does the work will not do it right, such as prep an area for painting or use inferior paint. The person they have designated to do the cleaning of our pool bathrooms and outside shower is also our security guard and she reports erroneous things to the president so homeowners get fines and get yelled at by the president.

    The HOA manager says he charges $250 to send an email to homeowners with the newsletter to inform us what is going to be done in the community but the newsletter is more of a reprimand when people question him or the president on anything. I am trying to find out if any of this is grounds for taking them to the real estate board or even if it would do any good.

    Thank you for listening.

    Go to comment
    2019/12/21 at 11:15 pm
    • From dennisl on AZHOC Inbox: Fed Up With Property Manager

      First let me apologize for the delay in responding to your question. Let’s start with the fact that the president of the management company is a member of your board. Was he appointed to the board to fill a vacancy or elected by the members? There are many things that the association is involved in that would be a direct conflict of interest for this board member. While Arizona’s conflict of interest laws are weak at best for any issue before the board that could provide financial benefit to this board member he must under the law declare the conflict of interest before any discussion on that issue is made. If he fails to do so than the action or contract is void. Watch this closely by attending meetings and reviewing meeting minutes. Many of the issues you raised are speculative and potential concerns but to bring any action or to file any petition to ADRE you need facts and proof. You are entitled to view all financial records of the association upon written request and the association is bound by law to provide you access to those records within 10 business days. Ask for a copy of the monthly financial reports provided to the board for both the operating and reserve accounts for any period of time that you are concerned with. You should also ask for the monthly bank statements for those accounts for the same time period. You are also entitled to ask for copies of those record and the association cannot charge you more than $0.15 per page. You will need to take time to review those records because if something is happening the culprits will try hard to cover and hide their tracts. If something looks fishy than dig deeper into the specific transactions that you identified by requesting details on the specific transactions, what was it for, who was it paid too, who authorized the transaction, who validated that the work was completed etc. Thru all of this you need to remember one thing management companies work for the board and can only charge fees that are authorized by the board in their contract with the board. If the board president and treasurer are working together for personal gain than it is up to the rest of the board to wake up and take action to protect the community. If the board refuses to do that than it is up to the community to protect themselves and get together and vote to remove the offending or all the board members. If you need help doing this than contact me and I’ll work you thru the processes to remove the board. Board members and entire boards can be removed with of without cause so if the community is concerned that they are being damaged they can act to protect them selves without the burden of absolute proof. These are not easy task and involve community action and participation that the board will fight in any way it can to suppress. We are working on a bill this session to protect this right for community action and assembly in State Law.


      Go to comment
      2020/01/02 at 8:28 am
  • From dennisl on Latent defect or out of luck?


    What a mess. I’m assuming that the developer still has control of the association. The city is the true power in this situation. I would request a meeting with the supervisor of the code enforcement office of your city. Bring pictures of the situation and the neighboring lots. This should be an issue between the City, HOA and Developer. The HOA and builder are essentially the same because the developer appoints the HOA board and their job is to protect the developer not to represent you or any other occupant of the community. The city has the power to stop all further building by the developer until he complies with city ordinances. The board is trying to get you to fix the issue so that it goes away, you cannot let them scare you into action you do not want. Do not let up on the city until they step up to the plate and force the developer to fix the code violation issues. This is a safety issue for you and any children that use the pools in this community. You bought a home that you reasonably believed would comply with all city codes and ordinances. Yours does not and you have every right to expect the builder to fix and address the issue, including the option of suing the builder or filing a complaint with the Registrar of Contractors. I’m assuming that the developer does not want bad publicity that may prevent him from selling other homes in the community. You also have the press and people like Joe Ducey “Let Joe Know” from channel 15. You would be amazed what Joe can do when he shows up with his camera crew at the front door of the developer, asking why he refuses to build his home in this community in compliance with city codes and ordinances?

    Go to comment
    2019/12/19 at 9:06 pm
  • From Mai on Can HOA restrict street parking on public street?

    Dennis, I was visiting and having dinner at my friend’s place. I parked right outside for less than two hours. When I came outside, my car was no longer there and I had thought it was stolen. I had called Mesa police and it turns out that my car had been towed by the HOA. I thought it was illegal to do that? What is the next appropriate step to take?

    Go to comment
    2019/12/19 at 1:06 am
    • From dennisl on Can HOA restrict street parking on public street?

      It depends on who owns the streets. If the streets are owned by the municipality and are public streets than yes if would be illegal for the HOA to have vehicles legally parked on public street to have them towed. If however the streets are not public and owned by the association than they have the right to establish rules and actions relative to parking. The issue is the rules have to be published and communicated to all residents prior to any enforcement action. First ask your friend if the association owns the streets, if they do not notify the city of Mesa of the illegal action of the association. If the association owns the streets and has published rules forbidding parking on the streets after dark or in certain spaces, than your issue is with the HOA and your friend. It is highly unusual for an association to tow a car without warning, but by now nothing surprises me any more about abuses that HOA’s can afflict against their homeowners and quest. State laws has a due process relative to rules violations and what the association must do relative to notice and providing the homeowner an opportunity to contest the alleged violation prior to taking enforcement action and or applying fines. Clearly the association did not comply with that law in this case. Again no real surprise most associations ignore the due process provisions of the law, mostly because they can unless challenged. I’m assuming that you are not a member of the community that towed your vehicle so that you cannot petition the ADRE relative to the violation of the state’s due process law for notice of violations. You could attempt a case in small claims (justice court) against the association for the cost of recovering your vehicle after it was towed, but before you do anything like that I would with your friends help research the rules of the association relative to parking and then speak to an attorney and get their advice on the legitimacy of your claim.

      Go to comment
      2019/12/19 at 8:38 pm
  • From Nicole Crown on Bylaws Lost and Found

    I have always paid my dues along with most members of the community. I have always maintained the position that everyone should be pay their dues even when things are not the best. However since this BOD took over it and hired a collections law firm and the management company of their choosing it has all been about voter suppression. They created delinquencies for most of the owners. The management company refuses to return calls or emails. Everything goes though management company to the attorneys that are running the place as if it was under receivership. No hoa meeting since February, no announcements, everything being done in secret.

    Go to comment
    2019/12/18 at 8:41 am
    • From dennisl on Bylaws Lost and Found

      I fully understand the tactic of boards using voter eligibility issues to suppress voter dissention and to maintain their positions on the board. While we have made some progress in changing the laws to restrict this and have a bill to be considered this year that will directly address this issue, I’ve little faith that changing the Laws of Arizona will do anything to change the situation in your community, because the board from what you have told me has chosen to ignore the law in every aspect of its business. Your only recourse is to do what you have tried to do already and that is to remove the board. Read the requirements of your newly found bylaws very carefully relative to member eligibility to vote and make sure that at least 11 people in your community satisfy those requirements. The board has no authority to disqualify voters other than what is specifically provided in your governing documents. Each person has the right to request whatever record the association has on them personally that can be used by the board to disqualify them from voting. Make the association prove that you are not eligible to vote, and contest any record that is inaccurate.

      You can use the ADRE to file a petition to force the board to comply with their governing documents or the law. This process is substantially less expensive than superior court. I can help you organize your petition(s) if you would like. We have to force the point to the board that compliance with the law and the governing documents is not optional. You have a right to open meeting and full transparency in the governance of your community, you need to demand that your association understand and provide for that right.


      Go to comment
      2019/12/18 at 9:38 am
  • From dennisl on Bylaws Lost and Found


    Thank you for the clarification. As you are hopefully aware I am not an attorney and cannot give you legal advice and this is getting a little off my level of experience. I will comment on several of the points that you brought up. Any action taken by the board by unanimous written consent is a violation of Arizona’s open meeting laws unless it involved emergency actions that could not wait the 48 hours for notice of a meeting of the board. I would seriously doubt the legitimacy of the board action to create bylaws that did not exist since they must have been created at the time of incorporation. Without the authority granted by the bylaws for the board to exclusively modify the bylaws without homeowner approval, they would clearly have no basis to believe that they could create a set on their own. So not only was the act improper, the method for adopting the bylaws was improper and illegal. Once the original bylaws were found that changes the entire game. I can only assume that they included provisions relative to member eligibility to vote. Because bylaws existed but were not provided to homeowners and home buyers raises serious concern of their legitimacy. Arizona law puts the burden of providing the governing documents for the community on the home seller for associations of less than 50 members. But how can a member provide information it was never supplied in the first place. It is the responsibility of the association as a corporation to maintain its governing documents and records and make them available to any member upon request. Your association clearly breached this responsibility and duty. This is where my experience ends and where legal counsel is required to pick up. If you wish to challenge the validity of the bylaws that were found then you absolutely need to seek legal counsel.

    Lastly I do want to point out that it is incredible to me to believe that more than half of the community are delinquent in their assessment payments. Clearly you all have to realize that whether their are bylaws or not you are all contractually bound to pay your assessments unconditionally. You do not get to pick and chose which laws you live to and which you ignore. This is what happens to homeowners based on bad boards and their advisors, it cannot be the position that the homeowners take if we are ever to make progress in protecting your rights in these communities. You had 41 homes and 22 homeowners signing a petition to remove the board. If only 11 signatures on that petition were by homeowners current in their assessment than the petition for a special meeting to remove the board was legitimate under Arizona Law. And the board is compelled by the same Arizona law to schedule and hold the meeting 30 days after the petition was received. While I believe in the fundamental right to vote the reality of these communities is that the fundamental premise is that each homeowner is required to pay their share of the cost of the association, it is plain and simple and not subject to interpretation either you pay or you don’t. If you don’t you should not be allowed to have a say in the governance of that community. This is your choice not the associations. What I want to work for is to limit the associations from denying homeowners the right to vote for other reasons other than payment of assessments.

    Rather than going to court again, pay your assessments and get the 11 people necessary to call a special meeting to remove the board, but when you do so have candidates ready to run for those board positions that will run this community appropriately.


    Go to comment
    2019/12/18 at 8:07 am
  • From Nicole Crown on Bylaws Lost and Found

    Thank you for the quick reply. A unique situation is an understament about what is going on in this small community.

    I would like to give some more factual background surrounding the case.

    Myself along with 22 owners, in a complex of 41 units filed a petition to remove all of the BOD. The BOD and their council say that all unit owners who signed the petition are delinquent in their assessment dues and do not call the special meeting. I file a lawsuit. The court sets up a briefing schedule. The court rules in my favor stating that the only governing documents proven to be in existence are the CCR’s , we do not have adopted bylaws, and they are required to have a removal.
    Our CCR’s state that all homeowners are entitled to cast one vote as long as they are a homeowner. There is also a clause for non-payment of assessment dues that does not include language that your vote is dependent on your paying/non-paying of dues.
    While we are waiting for them to call the removal meeting the BOD adopts the initial bylaws of the association by unanimous written consent. They send ballots stating delinquent homeowners can not vote because of the newly adopted bylaws containing a suspension of voting rights clause if you are delinquent in your assessments. We vote anyway and I take them back to court and the court once again rules in my favor. The court rules that the BOD is removed, and that the bylaws were not adopted properly. They were ordered to host a new election in compliance with state statute.
    They did not have any intention of hosting the new election and so through 22 signatures, the membership has called an election.
    This is where it gets complicated. About 30 days after the court ruling they find a copy of the bylaws that were signed by the original declarant and our election is not scheduled until December 23rd. . They filed a motion to reconsider with the court based on this new found evidence. We have been operating with no bylaws for over ten years. One owner out of 41 units had bylaws. Do the bylaws govern? Do the CCR’s govern? Statue is silent who is eligible to vote. Would this be considered a waiver of bylaws, if they have been out of circulation for as long as they have been?

    Go to comment
    2019/12/17 at 8:28 pm