HOA Denial and Retroactive Rule Change Regarding Sun Shades
We submitted an architectural design request to our HOA seeking approval to install mechanically retractable vertical sun shades on our pergola to improve the property’s energy efficiency and protect the health of its occupants. The HOA denied the request, stating that “Retractable mechanical shades are not permitted per the design review guidelines. As a suggestion and option, the Committee said tinting windows would be an approvable option.” However, no such restrictive guideline existed. And, this option makes little sense because, given the presence of our pergola, window sunscreens do not block the sun on the patio where the heat gain and UV exposure are greatest. The only relevant guideline, found under the patio cover section, stated that “mechanically retractable shades with solid colored cover will be approved upon request.”
Initially, the HOA indicated a willingness to work with us. When we discussed our shade selection with the HOA Architecture Committee and explained our intent to protect the occupants—and ourselves as owners—from harmful sun exposure, the committee clarified that the guideline about mechanically retractable shades applied only to horizontal shades, not to the vertical shades we proposed. They also expressed concern about vertical shades because some neighbors had installed similar shades that were poorly maintained. The Architecture Committee chair further explained that they did not want vertical shades used to conceal clutter on patios and preferred to maintain visibility into the property.
Despite this, after a formal demand letter pointed out that the restrictive guideline cited by the HOA did not actually exist and requested a response within 48 hours, the HOA held a board meeting—without any notice of this issue on the agenda—and voted to update the guidelines to ban vertical shades entirely. This sudden change appeared to be targeted specifically at our request.
At this point, we are seeking to understand how likely it is that a court would support us if we challenge the HOA’s denial. Is there legal precedent or guidance from your experience regarding whether an HOA can deny the installation of vertical UV-blocking shades proven to reduce heat gain under these conditions? How common is it for HOAs to retroactively change rules—especially without notice—to target a specific homeowner’s request? And what options are available to challenge selective enforcement or abrupt rule changes?
We also noted your support for HB 2732 last year. We would appreciate your experience and thoughts on why the bill was needed. Did HOA win challenges like this? Are existing solar energy and planned communities laws inadequate to address situations like ours? Any insights or advice would be greatly appreciated.
2 Responses
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
There is extensive case law and common law clearly establishing that the association had no authority to do anything that you described in your post. Current statutory law, however, is totally inadequate to correct what you describe, as it is not ever mentioned. While I’m not an attorney and cannot provide you legal advice i can provide you list of case law decisions from State Supreme Courts all validating the very limited ability of these associations to create restrictions on private property not specifically authorized in the CC&Rs. Since when would any association have the right to see inside your private property?
I’ll say this: if you contact an attorney, I’ll gladly provide that attorney with all the common law and case law precedents necessary for them to prevail in any case challenging the Architectural Standards or the process used by your association.
I’ll send you a copy of my draft legislative proposal to finally codify into law the very limited authority of the association to design control and ARC review rejection, at the e-mail you set up in your account.
Dennis
That “Since when would any association have the right to see inside your private property?” is exactly what we said.
Any information you can share would be greatly appreciated.
Please feel free to forward any draft materials. We are interested in supporting efforts that uphold homeowners’ rights.