AZHOC - Arizona Homeowners Coalition
Voice for homeowner rights and justice.
azhoatruth@gmail.com

Open meeting question

My hoa architectural committee consists of the board members. If they are discussing plans, proposals, changes to guidelines, etc are they required to comply with the open meeting law, provide agendas, meeting times etc? Bylaws allow for approvals by written consent but if the meet, should it comply with the law?

5 Responses

  1. Dennis Legere

    William,
    Current law is extremely vague relative to committees of the board like the ARC. The statute for open meeting applies to “regularly scheduled committee meetings”. Most ARC’s meet on demand and therefore are not regularly scheduled. I will have a bill this year that will change this and make that committee subject to the open meeting law.

    Dennis

  2. Tamara Block

    When your President of your HOA allows two
    Newly Elected (unwanted) board members
    To Co-Chair The Landscape Committee, but
    Removes the ARC portion out onto its own
    Separate Committee!!
    Meanwhile tying up the Landscape Committee
    In red tape making them as ineffective as possible
    While the Association Attorney states out-loud
    In open meeting, he sees no purpose in having
    A landscape committee. We also have pest control
    To handle as well.
    What are your thoughts on this?
    We are a nonprofit,

    1. Dennis Legere

      Tamara,
      Decision of the board are made by the entire board and not any single member of the board including the board president, unless the entire board gave the board president the power to create sub-committees as he/she sees fit. The board is empowered to create and terminate any committee that they want. To create a committee then to restrict its ability to do anything is totally asinine and a waste of time. Unfortunately, simple common sense and logic is a very rare commodity in these communities. At the next open board meeting, ask the board to explain why it created the landscape committee and what are the board’s intentions for what that committee will be intended to accomplish. I suspect that there is a hidden agenda at play here and the community should watch this very carefully. There is nothing illegal about separating the ARC into two committees, if I was on your board I would have done the same thing. The ARC’S primary purpose is design control and ascetics management for the member’s property, A landscape committee works to maintain the landscaping in the common area, two very different purposes.

      Dennis

Leave a Reply